Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus motherboard compatibility , additional power connectors power supply compatibility. Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in range. This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using x resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 the last being done in 4K resolution if possible , and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Usually measured in megahashes per second. Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Codenamed Barts Pro, the 's core has stream processors, running at MHz. That's two-thirds of the shaders you'll find in the , a difference the 50MHz faster clock speed is ill-equipped to make up. The fact that AMD can run this core at higher clock speeds is due to a smaller die-size, mm2 as opposed to the mm2 found on the previous generation.
You do get the full 32 ROPS mind, plus a slightly overhauled tessellation engine that improves performance at the more reasonable tessellation factors. The interesting thing here is that it uses DirectCompute to process the full scene after it has been rendered, to produce results similar to 4x MSAA but faster and at a reduced memory footprint.
Log in. Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4. Support UI. X Donate Contact us. New posts Trending Search forums. What's new. New posts New profile posts Latest activity. Current visitors New profile posts Search profile posts Billboard Trophies. Thread starter vaatur Start date Apr 30, Forums Hardware Graphics Cards.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Previous Next Sort by votes. Jun 16, 35 0 10, 0. I'd built my computer i, Asus HD 1GB about five years ago and am looking into replacing some components to update it.
I'm not looking to manually overclock the card. The RX's power consumption I have a w power supply -- I'm just not a fan of the watt to performance ratio and the GTX 's lower price for pretty much the same performance are my main reasons for leaning towards the I'd appreciate any advice you have to offer! Jan 28, 16, 2 60, 2, The ICX coolers are a waste of money for the lower end cards, I believe that range is only for the s and s.
WildCard Titan Moderator. Jul 18, 21, 1, 92, 4, Price to performance and considering your current parts I think the RX 4gb would be a good match and a good upgrade over your current card.
Sep 5, 5, 10 28, 1, You have a decent CPU, so you can get good use out of all those cards. It's just this, you have been living with this all this time. I have to believe you don't NEED that much videocard power to be happy or you'd have replaced the long ago.
You could certainly use a or but would you really benefit from the extra performance? I doubt it. So you'd be paying more for no real reason.
0コメント